Horton

Re: Logical Replication of sequences

vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>

View thread
From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
To: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Yogesh Sharma <yogesh.sharma@catprosystems.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, Hou, Zhijie/侯 志杰 <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, "Katz, Jonathan" <jkatz@amazon.com>
Date: 2024-06-11T05:33:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.

  2. Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.

  3. Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.

  4. Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.

  5. Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.

  6. Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.

  7. Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.

  8. Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.

  9. Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.

  10. Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.

  11. Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.

  12. Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.

  13. Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.

  14. Generate GUC tables from .dat file

On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 09:41, Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 5:00 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 12:24, Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 6:43 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 14:11, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> A new catalog table, pg_subscription_seq, has been introduced for
>> >> mapping subscriptions to sequences. Additionally, the sequence LSN
>> >> (Log Sequence Number) is stored, facilitating determination of
>> >> sequence changes occurring before or after the returned sequence
>> >> state.
>> >
>> >
>> > Can't it be done using pg_depend? It seems a bit excessive unless I'm missing
>> > something.
>>
>> We'll require the lsn because the sequence LSN informs the user that
>> it has been synchronized up to the LSN in pg_subscription_seq. Since
>> we are not supporting incremental sync, the user will be able to
>> identify if he should run refresh sequences or not by checking the lsn
>> of the pg_subscription_seq and the lsn of the sequence(using
>> pg_sequence_state added) in the publisher.  Also, this parallels our
>> implementation for pg_subscription_seq and will aid in expanding for
>> a) incremental synchronization and b) utilizing workers for
>> synchronization using sequence states if necessary.
>>
>> How do you track sequence mapping with the publication?
>>
>> In the publisher we use pg_publication_rel and
>> pg_publication_namespace for mapping the sequences with the
>> publication.
>
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I'm wondering what the complexity would be, if we
> wanted to do something similar on the subscriber side, i.e., tracking via
> pg_subscription_rel.

Because we won't utilize sync workers to synchronize the sequence, and
the sequence won't necessitate sync states like init, sync,
finishedcopy, syncdone, ready, etc., initially, I considered keeping
the sequences separate. However, I'm ok with using pg_subscription_rel
as it could potentially help in enhancing incremental synchronization
and parallelizing later on.

Regards,
Vignesh