Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 19:56, Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here is v69 patch set addressing above and Kuroda-san's comments in [1].
Few minor suggestions:
1) In the slot invalidation reporting below:
+ case RS_INVAL_IDLE_TIMEOUT:
+ Assert(inactive_since > 0);
+
+ /* translator: second %s is a GUC variable name */
+ appendStringInfo(&err_detail, _("The slot's
idle time %s exceeds the configured \"%s\" duration."),
+
timestamptz_to_str(inactive_since),
+
"idle_replication_slot_timeout");
+ /* translator: %s is a GUC variable name */
+ appendStringInfo(&err_hint, _("You might need
to increase \"%s\"."),
+
"idle_replication_slot_timeout");
It is logged like:
2025-02-05 10:04:11.616 IST [330567] DETAIL: The slot's idle time
2025-02-05 10:02:49.131631+05:30 exceeds the configured
"idle_replication_slot_timeout" duration.
Here even though we tell idle time, we are logging the inactive_since
value which kind of gives a wrong meaning.
How about we change it to:
The slot has been inactive since 2025-02-05 10:02:49.131631+05:30,
which exceeds the configured "idle_replication_slot_timeout" duration.
2) Here we have mentioned about invalidation happens only for a)
released slots b) inactive slots replication slots c) slot where
communication between pub and sub is down
+ * XXX: Slot invalidation due to 'idle_timeout' applies only to
+ * released slots, and is based on the
'idle_replication_slot_timeout'
+ * GUC. Active slots currently in use for replication
are excluded to
+ * prevent accidental invalidation. Slots where
communication between
+ * the publisher and subscriber is down are also
excluded, as they are
+ * managed by the 'wal_sender_timeout'.
+ */
+ InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots(RS_INVAL_IDLE_TIMEOUT,
+
0,
+
InvalidOid,
+
InvalidTransactionId);
a) Can we include about slots which does not reserve WAL are also not
considered.
b) Could we present this in a bullet-point format like the following:
+ * XXX: Slot invalidation due to 'idle_timeout' applies only to:
+ * 1) released slots, and is based on the
'idle_replication_slot_timeout'
+ * GUC. 2) Active slots currently in use for
replication are excluded to
+ * prevent accidental invalidation. 3) Slots where
communication between
+ * the publisher and subscriber is down are also
excluded, as they are
+ * managed by the 'wal_sender_timeout'.
+ */
c) While I was initially reviewing the patch I also had the similar
thoughts on my mind, if we could mention the one like "Slots where
communication between the publisher and subscriber is down are also
excluded, as they are managed by the 'wal_sender_timeout'" in the
documentation it might be good.
Regards,
Vignesh