Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>

From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-12T07:29:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:26 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
> rebased to appease cfbot.
>
> + couple of little fixes as 0002.

Thanks for rebasing and fixing a few issues. I have taken all your
changes except for mcxtfuncs changes as those changes were not done as
part of this patch. Attached v19 patch which has the changes for the
same.

Regards,
Vignesh

Commits

  1. Perform apply of large transactions by parallel workers.

  2. Enhance pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() for auxiliary processes.

  3. Allow GRANT on pg_log_backend_memory_contexts().

  4. Move Perl test modules to a better namespace

  5. Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods

  6. Add backtrace support for error reporting