Re: Logical Replication of sequences
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 11:03, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here are some review comments for patch v20240720-0002. > > ====== > 1. Commit message: > > 1a. > The commit message is stale. It is still referring to functions and > views that have been moved to patch 0003. Modified > 1b. > "ALL SEQUENCES" is not a command. It is a clause of the CREATE > PUBLICATION command. Modified > src/bin/psql/describe.c > > 2. describeOneTableDetails > > Although it's not the fault of this patch, this patch propagates the > confusion of 'result' versus 'res'. Basically, I did not understand > the need for the variable 'result'. There is already a "PGResult > *res", and unless I am mistaken we can just keep re-using that instead > of introducing a 2nd variable having almost the same name and purpose. This is intentional, we cannot clear res as it will be used in many places of printTable like in printTable->print_aligned_text->pg_wcssize which was earlier stored from printTableAddCell calls. The rest of the nitpicks comments were merged. The v20240724 version patch attached at [1] has the changes for the same. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1uncevCSMqo5Nk%3DtqqV_o3KNH_jwp8URiGop_nPC8BTg%40mail.gmail.com Regards, Vignesh