Re: Logical Replication of sequences
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
Attachments
- v20251111-0001-Documentation-for-sequence-synchronization.patch (text/x-patch) patch v20251111-0001
On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 at 11:23, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vignesh, > > A few more comments: > > > On Nov 7, 2025, at 22:47, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The attached v20251107_2 version patch has the changes for the same. > > > > Regards, > > Vignesh > > <v20251107_2-0001-Documentation-for-sequence-synchronizati.patch> > > 1 > ``` > - Currently, there can be only one synchronization worker per table. > + Currently, there can be only one table synchronization worker per table > + and one sequence synchronization worker to synchronize all sequences. > ``` > > Feels like this statement is not accurate and leaves an impression that a table has a fixed work to serve it. So I think we can enhance this statement a little bit as: > > ``` > Currently, only one table synchronization worker runs per table, and > only one sequence synchronization worker runs per subscription at a time. > ``` Changed it slightly. > 2 > ``` > +<programlisting> > +/* sub # */ CREATE SEQUENCE s1 START WITH 10 INCREMENT BY 1 > +/* sub # */ CREATE SEQUENCE s2 START WITH 100 INCREMENT BY 10; > +</programlisting></para> > ``` > > Missed semi-colon for the first SQL statement. Modified > 3 > ``` > +<programlisting> > +/* sub # */ SELECT srrelid::regclass, srsublsn FROM pg_subscription_rel ; > ``` > > Unneeded white-space before the semi-colon. Modified > 4 > ``` > +/* sub # */ SELECT * FROM s2 > + last_value | log_cnt | is_called > +------------+---------+----------- > + 610 | 0 | t > +(1 row) > ``` > > Again, missed semi-colon. Modified The attached v20251111 version patch has the changes for the same. Regards, Vignesh