Horton

Re: A rather hackish POC for alternative implementation of WITH TIES

Surafel Temsgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2020-03-26T07:22:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 3:35 PM Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
wrote:

> >>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>
>
> I was largely holding off on doing further work hoping for some
> discussion of which way we should go. If you think my approach is worth
> pursuing (I haven't seriously tested the performance, but I'd expect it
> to be slower than Surafel's - the price you pay for flexibility) then I
> can look at it further, but figuring out the planner stuff will take
> some time.
>
>
Other alternative can be pushing the existing implementation
which will be open to change in case of better-finished
implementation.

regards
Surafel

Commits

  1. Support FETCH FIRST WITH TIES