Re: Partial index "microvacuum"
Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-09-16T11:45:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:25 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > What about v14? There were significant changes to the > microvacuum/index deletion stuff in that release: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/btree-implementation.html#BTREE-DELETION Huh. Interesting. I'm sorry, I wasn't aware of this work and didn't have version 14 at hand. But it looks like both the partial index as well as the secondary index on (id::text) get cleaned up nicely there. I even tried a version where I have a snapshot open for the entire run, and the subsequents SELECTs clean the bloat up. I'll need to read up on the details a bit to understand exactly what changed, but it appears that at least this particular pattern has already been fixed. Thank you so much for your work on this! .m