Horton

Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function

Morris de Oryx <morrisdeoryx@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Morris de Oryx <morrisdeoryx@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-05T13:21:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Well *that *was quick. Thank you!

Imseih, Sami what are the chances of getting RDS to apply this patch?
Postgres 15 was released nearly 8 months ago, and it would be great to get
onto it.

Thanks

On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 3:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Morris de Oryx <morrisdeoryx@gmail.com> writes:
> > Can anyone suggest a path forward for me with the upgrade to PG 15?
>
> Apply this patch:
>
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=ca9e79274938d8ede07d9990c2f6f5107553b524
>
> or more likely, pester RDS to do so sooner than the next quarterly
> releases.
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>

Commits

  1. Doc: explain about dependency tracking for new-style SQL functions.

  2. Fix pg_dump's failure to honor dependencies of SQL functions.

  3. Fix misuse of pg_log_info() for details/hints.