Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>
From: Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-11-10T18:26:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Nov 5, 2011 9:02 AM, "Greg Smith" <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 11/04/2011 05:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Scott Mead<scottm@openscg.com> writes: >> >>> >>> I leave the waiting flag in place for posterity. With this in mind, is >>> the consensus: >>> RUNNING >>> or >>> ACTIVE >>> >> >> Personally, I'd go for lower case. >> > > > I was thinking it would be nice if this state looked like the WAL sender state values in pg_stat_replication, which are all lower case. For comparison those states are: > > startup > backup > catchup > streaming +1, it'll be easier to query against. > > -- > Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD > PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers