Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>
From: Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-01-17T00:43:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- pg_stat_activity_state_query.v5.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v5
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> On 01/12/2012 11:57 AM, Scott Mead wrote: >> >>> Pretty delayed, but please find the attached patch that addresses all >>> the issues discussed. >>> >> >> The docs on this v4 look like they suffered a patch order problem here. >> In the v3, you added a whole table describing the pg_stat_activity >> documentation in more detail than before. v4 actually tries to remove >> those new docs, a change which won't even apply as they don't exist >> upstream. >> >> My guess is you committed v3 to somewhere, applied the code changes for >> v4, but not the documentation ones. It's easy to do that and end up with a >> patch that removes a bunch of docs the previous patch added. I have to be >> careful to always do something like "git diff origin/master" to avoid this >> class of problem, until I got into that habit I did this sort of thing >> regularly. >> >> gak > I did a 'backwards' diff last time. This time around, I diff-ed off of a fresh pull of 'master' (and I did the diff in the right direction. Also includes whitespace cleanup and the pg_stat_replication (procpid ==> pid) regression fix. --Scott > > Okay, I'll fix that and the rules.out regression that I missed > > --Scott > OpenSCG, http://www.openscg.com > > > >> >> -- >> Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD >> PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com >> >> >