Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 9:34 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 5:46 AM Jakub Wartak > <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > Cool, anything > 1 is just better. Just quick question, so now we have: > > > > #define DEFAULT_EFFECTIVE_IO_CONCURRENCY 16 > > #define DEFAULT_MAINTENANCE_IO_CONCURRENCY 10 > > > > Shouldn't maintenance be now also at the same value (16) instead of > > 10? Also, fc34b0d9de27 (5 years ago by Thomas) states about m_io_c: > > "Use the new setting in heapam.c instead of the hard-coded formula > > effective_io_concurrency + 10 introduced by commit 558a9165e08.", so > > there was always assumption that m_io_c > e_io_c (?) Now it's kind of > > inconsistent to see bitmap heap scans pushing more IOPs than > > recovery(!)/ANALYZE/VACUUM or am I missing something? No pressure to > > change, just asking what Your thoughts are. > > Yea, I'm not really sure what if any relationship the two GUCs should > have to one another. > As long as they are in the same ballpark, since > they are tuning for the same machine, I don't see any reason their > values need to be adjusted together. However, if it is confusing for > maintenance_io_concurrency default to be 10 while > effective_io_concurrency default is 16, I'm happy to change it. Hi Melanie, dunno, I've just asked if it isn't suspicious to anyone except me else that e_io_c > m_io_c rather than e_io_c <= m_io_c. My understanding was always that to tune max IO queue depth you would do this: a. up to N backends (up to max_connections; usually much lower) * e_io_c b. autovacuum_max_workers * m_io_c c. just one (standby/recovering) * m_io_c The thing (for me) is: if we are allowing for much higher IOPS "a" scenario, then why standby cannot use just the same (if not higher) IOPS for prefetching in "c" scenario. After all, it is a much more critical and sensitive thing (lag). > I just don't quite know what I would write in the commit message. "it seemed confusing that they weren't the same?" "To keep with the historical legacy of maintenance_io_concurrency being traditionally higher than effective_io_concurrency ..." OK, so right, nobody else commented on this, so maybe it's just me and it was just a question after all. -J.
Commits
-
Fix bitmapheapscan incorrect recheck of NULL tuples
- aea916fe555a 18.0 landed
-
Increase default maintenance_io_concurrency to 16
- cc6be07ebde2 18.0 landed
-
Separate TBM[Shared|Private]Iterator and TBMIterateResult
- 944e81bf99db 18.0 landed
-
Improve read_stream.c advice for dense streams.
- 7ea8cd15661e 18.0 landed
-
Increase default effective_io_concurrency to 16
- ff79b5b2aba0 18.0 landed
-
Delay extraction of TIDBitmap per page offsets
- bfe56cdf9a4e 18.0 landed
-
Add lossy indicator to TBMIterateResult
- b8778c4cd8bc 18.0 landed
-
Move BitmapTableScan per-scan setup into a helper
- a5358c14b2fe 18.0 landed
-
Add and use BitmapHeapScanDescData struct
- f7a8fc10ccb8 18.0 landed
-
Fix bitmap table scan crash on iterator release
- 754c610e13b8 18.0 landed
-
Bitmap Table Scans use unified TBMIterator
- 1a0da347a7ac 18.0 landed
-
Add common interface for TBMIterators
- 7f9d4187e7ba 18.0 landed
-
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly
- de380a62b5da 18.0 landed
-
Move EXPLAIN counter increment to heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block
- 7bd7aa4d3067 18.0 landed
-
Refactor tidstore.c iterator buffering.
- f6bef362cac8 18.0 cited
-
BitmapHeapScan: Remove incorrect assert and reset field
- a3e6c6f92991 17.0 landed
-
Change BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator to accept BlockNumber
- 92641d8d651e 17.0 landed
-
BitmapHeapScan: Use correct recheck flag for skip_fetch
- 1fdb0ce9b109 17.0 landed
-
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM
- 04e72ed617be 17.0 landed
-
BitmapHeapScan: postpone setting can_skip_fetch
- fe1431e39cdd 17.0 landed
-
BitmapHeapScan: begin scan after bitmap creation
- 1577081e9614 17.0 landed
-
Fix EXPLAIN Bitmap heap scan to count pages with no visible tuples
- f3e4581acdc8 12.19 landed
- 992189a3e94d 13.15 landed
- 262757b73286 14.12 landed
- d3d95f583995 15.7 landed
- 1f4eb734200a 16.3 landed
- 0960ae1967d0 17.0 landed
-
Remove redundant snapshot copying from parallel leader to workers
- 84c18acaf690 17.0 landed
-
Remove some obsolete smgrcloseall() calls.
- 6a8ffe812d19 17.0 cited
-
Remove the "snapshot too old" feature.
- f691f5b80a85 17.0 cited
-
Compute XID horizon for page level index vacuum on primary.
- 558a9165e081 12.0 cited