Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability
Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>
From: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-07T11:33:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v9-0001-Add-optional-dependency-to-libnuma-Linux-only-for.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v9-0001
- v9-0003-Add-pg_shmem_numa_allocations-to-show-NUMA-zones-.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v9-0003
- v9-0002-Extend-pg_buffercache-with-new-view-pg_buffercach.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v9-0002
On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 11:20 AM Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Hi, > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:30 AM Jakub Wartak > <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >Hi, > > > > Yeah, that's why I was mentioning to use a "shared" populate_buffercache_entry() > > > or such function: to put the "duplicated" code in it and then use this > > > shared function in pg_buffercache_pages() and in the new numa related one. > > > > OK, so hastily attempted that in 7b , I had to do a larger refactor > > there to avoid code duplication between those two. I don't know which > > attempt is better though (7 vs 7b).. > > > > I'm attaching basically the earlier stuff (v7b) as v8 with the > following minor changes: > - docs are included > - changed int8 to int4 in one function definition for numa_zone_id .. and v9 attached because cfbot partially complained about .cirrus.tasks.yml being adjusted recently (it seems master is hot these days). -J.
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
doc: Correct pg_shmem_allocations_numa.size data type
- b8a6078ca8f4 18.0 landed
-
Add pg_buffercache_numa view with NUMA node info
- ba2a3c2302f1 18.0 landed
-
Add support for basic NUMA awareness
- 65c298f61fc7 18.0 landed
-
Introduce pg_shmem_allocations_numa view
- 8cc139bec34a 18.0 landed