Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively
Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>
From: Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-08-15T06:04:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>
>
> My idea of an ideal solution is the introduction of the possibility to use
> "any" pseudotype as return type with possibility to set default return
> type. Now, "any" is allowed only for arguments. The planner can set the
> expected type when it knows it, or can use the default type.
>
> so for extraction of jsonb field we can use FUNCTION
> jsonb_extract_field(jsonb, text) RETURNS "any" DEFAULT jsonb
>
Is this an existing framework or do you want to create something new?
>
> if we call SELECT jsonb_extract_field(..., 'x') -> then it returns jsonb,
> if we use SELECT jsonb_extract_field('...', 'x')::date, then it returns date
>
If so, what is the difference from the current jsonb->'f' and
(jsonb->'f' )::date?
>
> With this possibility we don't need to touch to cast functions, and we can
> simply implement similar functions for other non atomic types.
>
What do you mean by "atomic type" here? If you want to introduce some new
framework, I think we need a very clear benefit.
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add trailing commas to enum definitions
- 611806cd726f 17.0 cited