Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop function operation" on DB with functions having same name
David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
From: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Ash M <makmarath@hotmail.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-02-11T02:36:17Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- drop_func_if_not_exists_fix_v5.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v5
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 11:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Hmm ... I'd not looked at this before, but now that I do, the new API > for LookupFuncName seems mighty confused, or at least confusingly > documented. It's not clear what the combinations of the flags actually > do, or why you'd want to use them. > > I wonder whether you'd be better off replacing the two bools with an > enum, or something like that. Okay. Here's a modified patch with the enum. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Commits
-
Improve error reporting for DROP FUNCTION/PROCEDURE/AGGREGATE/ROUTINE.
- bfb456c1b965 12.0 landed