Re: executor relation handling

David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>

From: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2018-09-28T08:21:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 28 September 2018 at 20:00, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I've made minor tweaks, which find in
> the attached updated patches (a .diff file containing changes from v6 to
> v7 is also attached).

Thanks for looking over the changes.

I've looked at the v6 to v7 diff and it seems all good, apart from:

+ * The following asserts that the necessary lock on the relation

I think we maybe should switch the word "assert" for "verifies". The
Assert is just checking we didn't get a NoLock and I don't think
you're using "assert" meaning the Assert() marco, so likely should be
changed to avoid confusion.

Apart from that, I see nothing wrong with the patches, so I think we
should get someone else to look. I'm marking it as ready for
committer.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


Commits

  1. Avoid O(N^2) cost in ExecFindRowMark().

  2. Remove some unnecessary fields from Plan trees.

  3. Restore sane locking behavior during parallel query.

  4. Remove more redundant relation locking during executor startup.

  5. In the executor, use an array of pointers to access the rangetable.

  6. Centralize executor's opening/closing of Relations for rangetable entries.

  7. Change executor to just Assert that table locks were already obtained.

  8. Change rewriter/planner/executor/plancache to depend on RTE rellockmode.

  9. Add assertions that we hold some relevant lock during relation open.

  10. Create an RTE field to record the query's lock mode for each relation.