Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?

David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>

From: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>

To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>

Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2019-06-09T05:44:58Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

part_doc_master_v4.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4
part_doc_pg11_v4.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4
part_doc_pg10_v4.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 17:11, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> Sorry, but I think this is still an issue:
>
> >    Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should be
> >    divided by is also a critical decision to make.  Not having enough
>
> I think it should say:
>
> |    Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should be
> |    divided is also a critical decision to make.  Not having enough

Alright. I guess I misunderstood you. Updated patches are attached.


-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Commits

doc: Fix grammatical error in partitioning docs
- 1bbcbfaf7824 10.9 landed
- e23338cec4fb 11.4 landed
- ddc053dc503a 12.0 landed
doc: Add best practises section to partitioning docs
- 6e1dc84533e4 10.9 landed
- 936b5e589e04 11.4 landed
- e788e849addd 12.0 landed