Horton

Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees

David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-07-03T06:16:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 3 July 2018 at 18:11, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:00:46PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> I think it should be backpatched to v11 and v10. Your original commit
>> went there too. I don't see any reason to do any different here than
>> what you did with the original commit.
>
> expand_partitioned_rtentry is new as of v11.  Or you mean to tweak
> expand_inherited_rtentry() perhaps?  I am not sure that it is worth it
> as the code has already diverged between 10 and 11.

Oh right. I'd forgotten that changed in v11. I think the v10 code is
fine as is then.


-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Remove dead code for temporary relations in partition planning

  2. Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees

  3. Expand partitioned table RTEs level by level, without flattening.