Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?

David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>

From: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>

To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2019-04-11T03:34:30Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

docs_partitioning_warning_master.patch (application/octet-stream) patch

On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 00:51, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Just so I don't forget about this, I've added it to the July 'fest.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2065/

Now that we have 428b260f8, I think the version of this that goes into
master should be more like the attached.

I think the original patch is fine for the back branches.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Commits

Tweak partitioning documentation wording
- 12b9affb32a6 11.0 landed
docs: Rework sections on partition pruning/exclusion
- bebc46931a12 11.0 landed
Add GUC enable_partition_pruning
- 055fb8d33da6 11.0 landed