Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?

David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>

From: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>

To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>

Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2019-06-09T05:07:39Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

part_doc_master_v3.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v3
part_doc_pg11_v3.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v3
part_doc_pg10_v3.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v3

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 16:21, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> I meant it should say "into which it should be divided" and not "by which it
> should be divided INTO", which has too many prepositions.  This is still an
> issue:

It now reads "divided by" instead of "divided into".

> |    these two types of workload, it is important to make the right decisions
> |    early, as re-partitioning large quantities of data can be ...

I've added a comma after "early".

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Commits

doc: Fix grammatical error in partitioning docs
- 1bbcbfaf7824 10.9 landed
- e23338cec4fb 11.4 landed
- ddc053dc503a 12.0 landed
doc: Add best practises section to partitioning docs
- 6e1dc84533e4 10.9 landed
- 936b5e589e04 11.4 landed
- e788e849addd 12.0 landed