Thread

Re: create table like including storage parameter

David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> — 2025-09-29T01:28:45Z

On Sunday, September 28, 2025, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Since we already support INCLUDING STORAGE, I’m not sure that
> INCLUDING STORAGE PARAMETER is the right syntax to go with.
>

I’d just call it “including parameters”; sure, all of the existing ones are
storage related, but if there were non-storage ones we’d include those as
well, so qualifying with a parameter type doesn’t seem correct.

David J.