Re: documentation structure

David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>

From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-03-22T16:55:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. docs: Consistently use <optional> to indicate optional parameters

  2. docs: Consolidate into new "WAL for Extensions" chapter.

  3. freespace: Don't return blocks past the end of the main fork.

  4. docs: Merge separate chapters on built-in index AMs into one.

  5. docs: Demote "Monitoring Disk Usage" from chapter to section.

  6. doc: move system views section to its own chapter

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024, 09:32 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> I notice that you say that the "Installation" section should "cover
> the architectural overview and point people to where they can find the
> stuff they need to install PostgreSQL in the various ways available to
> them" so maybe you're not imagining a four-sentence chapter, either.
>

Fair point but I posit that new users are looking for a chapter named
Installation in the documentation.  At least the ones willing to read
documentation.  Having two of them isn't needed but having zero doesn't
make sense either.

The current proposal does that so I'm ok as-is but it can be further
improved by moving source install talk elsewhere and having the
installation chapter redirect the reader there for details.  I'm not
concerned with how long or short the resultant installation chapter is.

David J.

>
>