Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-13T21:26:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Actually ... if we did it like that, then it would be possible to treat > the signature + description + example(s) as one big table cell with line > breaks rather than row-separator bars. > That would help address the > inadequate-visual-separation-between-groups issue, but on the other hand > maybe we'd end up with too little visual separation between the elements > of a function description. > Speaking in terms of HTML if we use <hr /> instead of <br /> we would get the best of both worlds. David J.
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed