Re: PG_VERSION_NUM formatted incorrectly
David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Kieran McCusker <kieran.mccusker@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-01-22T18:47:36Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Kieran McCusker <kieran.mccusker@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi > > I was looking at an issue with ogr_fdw where it is trying to get > the PG_VERSION_NUM when I noticed that in Postgresql 10.1 this is declared > as: > > #define PG_VERSION_NUM 100001 > > But shouldn't it be > > #define PG_VERSION_NUM 100100 > > or am I being dense, in which case sorry to have bothered you. > > Beginning with v10 the middle two digits with ALWAYS be zero - only the first two (major release) and last two (patch version) are changed. 10.1 means v10 with the first patch release, unless 9.6 which is a major version in its own right and, with patch version, reads 9.6.3 David J.