Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather
David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: kline.christopher@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-02-15T16:10:00Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:55 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > > In the default postgresql.conf that is generated, there are the following > > lines: > > > #max_worker_processes = 8 # (change requires restart) > > #max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 2 # taken from max_parallel_workers > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< THIS > > #max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 2 # taken from max_parallel_workers > > max_parallel_workers = 8 # maximum number of > max_worker_processes that > > # can be used in parallel > operations > > > it indicates that the default value is taken from whatever > > max_parallel_workers is. > > No, you're misreading it. There's no magic connection between these > two settings. What the comment means to say is that the per-gather > worker processes come out of a pool of at most max_parallel_workers > processes. Perhaps another wording would be better, but we don't have > a lot of space here --- any thoughts? > > max_parallel workers = 8 # allocated from max_worker_processes max_parallel_*_workers = N # allocated from max_parallel_workers or maybe "consumed from ..." Or max_parallel_*_workers = N # capped at max_parallel_workers The last one turns a process-oriented description into a constraint, the latter seems to fit better in a config file. David J.
Commits
-
Doc: improve a couple of comments in postgresql.conf.sample.
- ed1b0ade703a 15.7 landed
- 88cbdcafdb74 12.19 landed
- 6686e9676c8f 14.12 landed
- 5c9f2f9398b4 17.0 landed
- 1a6dcfecab9f 16.3 landed
- 150ac3695f31 13.15 landed