Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather

David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>

From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: kline.christopher@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-02-15T16:10:00Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:55 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> > In the default postgresql.conf that is generated, there are the following
> > lines:
>
> > #max_worker_processes = 8             # (change requires restart)
> > #max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 2  # taken from max_parallel_workers
> > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< THIS
> > #max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 2 # taken from max_parallel_workers
> > max_parallel_workers = 8              # maximum number of
> max_worker_processes that
> >                                       # can be used in parallel
> operations
>
> > it indicates that the default value is taken from whatever
> > max_parallel_workers is.
>
> No, you're misreading it.  There's no magic connection between these
> two settings.  What the comment means to say is that the per-gather
> worker processes come out of a pool of at most max_parallel_workers
> processes.  Perhaps another wording would be better, but we don't have
> a lot of space here --- any thoughts?
>
> max_parallel workers = 8   # allocated from max_worker_processes

max_parallel_*_workers = N  # allocated from max_parallel_workers

or maybe "consumed from ..."

Or

max_parallel_*_workers = N # capped at max_parallel_workers

The last one turns a process-oriented description into a constraint, the
latter seems to fit better in a config file.

David J.

Commits

  1. Doc: improve a couple of comments in postgresql.conf.sample.