Re: Reporting by family tree
David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Ibrahim Shaame <ishaame@gmail.com>
Cc: swastik Gurung <gurung_swastik@yahoo.com>, "pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-10-05T15:02:43Z
Lists: pgsql-novice
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 7:54 AM Ibrahim Shaame <ishaame@gmail.com> wrote: > WITH RECURSIVE ukoo AS ( > SELECT namba, > jina, > baba, > babu, > nasaba_1, > daraja > FROM majina2 > WHERE majina2.nasaba_1 IN (SELECT DISTINCT namba FROM majina2) > > UNION ALL > > SELECT mtoto.namba, > mtoto.jina, > mtoto.baba, > mtoto.babu, > mtoto.nasaba_1, > daraja > FROM majina2 mtoto > WHERE mtoto.nasaba_1 NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT namba FROM majina2) > > The reason it is called a "recursive" CTE is that the subquery following the union all is recursive in nature - i.e., it should refer to itself. You named the CTE ukoo but you never actually refer to ukoo in the recursive subquery. Thus, you have not written a recursive query. When you reference the recursive "table" in the subquery its contents contain the results of the previous iteration, that is what allows you to select a child record and then consider that record a parent when finding the next depth/layer of children. David J.