Re: Range partitioning and overlap
David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Edson Richter <edsonrichter@hotmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-11-13T20:32:52Z
Lists: pgsql-general, pgsql-docs
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:29 PM Edson Richter <edsonrichter@hotmail.com> wrote: > "Range Partitioning > > The table is partitioned into “ranges” defined by a key column or set of > columns, with no overlap between the ranges of values assigned to different > partitions. For example, one might partition by date ranges, or by ranges > of identifiers for particular business objects." > Is there a misinterpretation from my side, or examples are inconsistent > with the paragraph above? > Further on the documentation: "When creating a range partition, the lower bound specified with FROM is an inclusive bound, whereas the upper bound specified with TO is an exclusive bound." David J.
Commits
-
Doc: improve partitioning discussion in ddl.sgml.
- dbca94510c9e 14.0 landed
- a87d7801c24f 11.11 landed
- 2b7759508542 12.6 landed
- 0e0e71abdcae 13.2 landed