Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-15T18:56:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:13 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > As discussed in the thread at [1], I've been working on redesigning > the tables we use to present SQL functions and operators. The > first installment of that is now up; see tables 9.30 and 9.31 at > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-datetime.html > > and table 9.33 at > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-enum.html > > The centering of the headers doesn't do it for me. Too much gap and the data itself is not centered so there is a large disconnect between the headers and the values. The run-on aspect of the left-aligned setup is of some concern but maybe just adding some left padding to the second column - and right padding to the first - can provide the desired negative space without adding so much as to break usability. David J.
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed