Horton

Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats

David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-02-21T16:07:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 2:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:18 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> > > The view name could be pg_stat_subscription_lrep,
> > > pg_stat_logical_replication, or something on those lines.
> >
> > pg_stat_subscription_stats :)
> >
>
> Having *stat* two times in the name sounds slightly odd to me but let
> us see what others think. One more option could be
> pg_stat_subscription_replication.
>
>
Agreed.

pg_stat_subscription_activity

We already have pg_stat_activity (which may be an argument against the
suggestion...)

David J.

Commits

  1. Reconsider pg_stat_subscription_workers view.

  2. Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.