Re: Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST
David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: greenreaper@hotmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, michael@paquier.xyz
Date: 2023-01-24T20:21:23Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
Michael, please see below: On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:44 PM PG Doc comments form < noreply@postgresql.org> wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/spgist-builtin-opclasses.html > Description: > > I wanted to add an SP-GIST index for an inet field ip_address > > In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/spgist-builtin-opclasses.html > network_ops is stated as the built-in opclass for (inet, inet) > [...] > I notice inet_ops, not network_ops, is mentioned in the docs for 13. Perhaps > it was renamed to network_ops in 15 but not 14? > I'm fairly certain this is a simple typo while performing some refactoring work here: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/7a1cd5260aa20bc13aec8960a57904b5623d1830 doc/src/sgml/spgist.sgml L105 + <entry valign="middle" morerows="10"><literal>network_ops</literal></entry> L185 - <entry><literal>inet_ops</literal></entry> David J.
Commits
-
doc: Fix network_ops -> inet_ops in SpGiST operator class list
- e9774151c278 14.7 landed
- 88c27b8fe201 15.2 landed
- d7c4830abb18 16.0 landed
-
doc: Rework tables for built-in operator classes of index AMs
- 7a1cd5260aa2 14.0 cited