Horton

Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode

David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Cc: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-06-08T16:16:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Just *when* is git ready for testing? You don't know from the outside.
>
> I do lurk here a lot and still am unsure quite often.
>
> Even simply releasing an alpha *tarball* would be useful enough. What
> is needed is the signal to test, rather than a fully-built package.
>
>
​IIUC the master branch is always ready for testing.

​I do not think the project cares whether everyone is testing the exact
same codebase; as long as test findings include the relevant commit hash
the results will be informative.

David J.​

Commits

  1. Add Valgrind buffer access instrumentation.

  2. Fix wrong merge resolution making pg_receivexlog fail in 9.2.