Re: TOAST versus toast

David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>

From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-04-12T02:30:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. doc: TOAST not toast

On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 8:33 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for your suggestions. At this point option (1) is looking most
> attractive. Probably, I will just withdraw the CF entry soon unless
> there is some new interest. Just chipping away fixing a few places
> isn't going to achieve the consistency this thread was aiming for.
>
>
I've moved this back to waiting on author pending a final decision.
Interested parties might still chime in but it doesn't seem like it is
actively looking for reviewers at this point.

David J.