Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-13T20:31:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:27 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com> writes: > > > - I think there should be much more distinctive lines between the > different > > functions. As it is the fact that the table is groups of 3 lines doesn’t > > jump out at the eye. > > I don't know any easy way to do that. We do already have the grouping > visible in the first column... > Can we lightly background color every other rowgroup (i.e., "greenbar")? I don't think having a separate Result column helps. The additional horizontal whitespace distances all relevant context information (at least on a wide monitor). Having the example rows mirror the Signature row seems like an easier to consume choice. e.g., enum_first(null::rainbow) → red date '2001-09-28' + 7 → 2001-10-05 Its also removes the left alignment in a fixed width column which draws unwanted visual attention. David J.
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed