Horton

Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather

David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Christopher Kline <kline.christopher@gmail.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-02-15T19:41:59Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs 
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Christopher Kline <kline.christopher@gmail.com> writes:
> > Thank you all for the clarification. I like David Johnston's suggestion
> of
> > # capped at max_parallel_workers
> > That clearly defines the constraint.
>
> I was thinking perhaps "# limited by max_parallel_workers"
> or something like that.  "Capped at" isn't phraseology we
> use elsewhere.
>
>
"limited by" is indeed better IMO as well.

David J.

Commits

  1. Doc: improve a couple of comments in postgresql.conf.sample.