Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-12-07T02:57:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 6:36 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to "fix" this but IIUC there is no consensus yet about what > order is best for patch 0001, right? > > I'm planning on performing a more thorough review of 0003 and 0004 tomorrow. As for 0001 - go with Peter E.'s suggested ordering. David J.
Commits
-
doc: Re-order Table 28.2 "Collected Statistics Views"
- 72e0ff2677c4 16.0 landed
-
doc: Re-order Table 28.35 "Per-Backend Statistics Functions"
- b1d0158060f3 16.0 landed
-
doc: Re-order Table 28.12 "Wait Events of type LWLock"
- 9c558b94f0ca 16.0 landed
-
doc: Re-order sections of "28.4. Progress Reporting"
- 6573643501e9 16.0 landed