Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>
From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>
To: David Christensen <david@pgguru.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-08-13T14:57:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add GROUP BY ALL.
- ef38a4d9756d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor to avoid code duplication in transformPLAssignStmt.
- b0fb2c6aa5a4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix missed copying of groupDistinct in transformPLAssignStmt.
- b7f6798c056a 16.11 landed
- 9ca79896aba3 15.15 landed
- 78a284b0b8d4 18.1 landed
- 7504d2be9eb4 19 (unreleased) landed
- 3fc9aa5b0233 17.7 landed
- 0be39b4b1a01 14.20 landed
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:37 AM David Christensen <david@pgguru.net> wrote: > I'm not married to the exact syntax of this feature; anything else short > and consistent could work if `ALL` is considered to potentially > gain a different interpretation in the future. > GROUP BY * Just kidding. But a big +1 to the whole concept. It would have been extraordinarily useful over the years. Cheers, Greg