Re: Changing the default random_page_cost value

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 5:15 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

> I am not a fan of this patch.  I don't see why _removing_ the magnetic
> part helps because you then have no logic for any 1.2 was chosen.


Okay, but we have no documented logic on why 4.0 was chosen either. :)

I would put the magnetic in a separate paragraph perhaps, and recommend
> 4.0 for it.


Sounds doable. Even in the pre-SSD age I recall lowering this as a fairly
standard practice, but I'm fine with a recommendation of 4. Partly because
I doubt anyone will use it much.

 Also, per-tablespace makes sense because of physical media
> differences, but what purpose would per-database and per-role serve?
> Also, per-tablespace is not a connection-activated item like the other
> two.
>

Good point, I withdraw that part.

Cheers,
Greg