Re: [PATCH] pgpassfile connection option

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:

>
> Hello Julian,
>
> I've adressed those spacing errors.
>>
>
> Ok.
>
> You are right, if pgpassfile_used is true, it SHOULD be defined, I just
>> like to be careful whenever I'm working with strings. But I guess in this
>> scenario I can trust the caller and omit those checks.
>>
>
> Good.
>
> Patch looks ok, applies, compiles & checks, and tested manually.
>
> I've switch in the CF to "ready for committer", and we'll see what the
> next level thinks about it:-)
>
> [...] I agree with those criticisms of the multi-host feature and
>> notifying the client in case of an authentification error rather than
>> trying other hosts seems sensible to me.
>>
>
> Sure. I complained about the fuzzy documentation & imprecise warning
> message because I stumbled upon that while testing.
>
> But I think fixes for those should be part of different patches, as this
>> patch's aim was only to expand the existing pgpassfile functionality to be
>> used with a parameter.
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
Moved to next commitfest with same status (ready for committer).


Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia