Re: BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password
Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>
From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, brown@fastmail.com,
"pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-11-04T00:24:12Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote: >> Here I attached a separate patch to handle the reuse of password for >> vacuumdb -all >> case. The same behavior exists in all supported branches. > > Sure. Still you don't actually need a double pointer as you do. You > could just reuse the password from the connection obtained via > connectMaintenanceDatabase and pass the password from this connection > as the argument to vacuum_one_database. Something like the attached > seems more elegant IMO. Why I used a double pointer is to support the scenario like the following. - There is no password requirement for Postgres, template1 and maintenance db that is provided by the user. - But there is a password requirement for user databases. - If user doesn't provide the password during connection to Maintenance database, later it prompts for password while connecting to user database. - Without the double pointer, further on for every database, it prompts for the password and also the case of --analyze-in-stages prompts for password for the all the stages. Regards, Hari Babu Fujitsu Australia
Commits
-
vacuumdb: don't prompt for passwords over and over
- 83dec5a712af 9.6.0 landed
- 5094da99b901 9.5.0 landed