Horton

Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>

View thread
From: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, shveta malik <shvetamalik@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-05-25T04:18:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 9:10 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 11:01 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Amit, Vignesh,
> >
> > A part of 007 patch is about preserving subscription-oid. Another
> > thread (origin migration) also needs the same logic as per discussion
> > at [1]. And there was a old thread which already attempted preserving
> > subscription-oid at [2], but the idea was rejected at that time. Why
> > don't we attempt to resume the same thread ([2]) and implement
> > preserving subscription-oid as a separate thread as we now have
> > multiple dependencies on it? Thoughts?
> >
>
> Agreed, but I think we can move the discussion/review to a separate
> thread. However, at this stage, we can make initial patches ready and
> then move to it.
>

Okay, works for me.

thanks
Shveta