Re: Logical Replication of sequences

shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>

From: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>, shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-07-21T06:47:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.

  2. Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.

  3. Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.

  4. Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.

  5. Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.

  6. Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.

  7. Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.

  8. Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.

  9. Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.

  10. Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.

  11. Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.

  12. Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.

  13. Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.

  14. Generate GUC tables from .dat file

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:15 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 3. Some of the syntaxes works for sequence which doesn't make sense to
> me, as listed below, I think there are more
>
> postgres[154731]=# CREATE PUBLICATION insert_only FOR ALL SEQUENCES
> WITH (publish = 'insert');
> CREATE PUBLICATION
>
> postgres[154731]=# CREATE PUBLICATION pub FOR ALL SEQUENCES WITH (
> PUBLISH_VIA_PARTITION_ROOT );
> CREATE PUBLICATION

+1. I had the same concerns at [1]. It might be feasible to restrict
this if we have CREATE SUB for ALL SEQ alone. But if we have ALL
SEQUENCES and ALL TABLES together, then 'WITH'  makes sense for tables
but not for sequences. My suggestion earlier was to display a NOTICE
at-least to say that WITH is not applicable to SEQUENCES (in case we
can not restrict it).

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJpy0uBFXJLOiFOL8QgSeS93Bf%3DZQd86BXZa%3DMeijHQo-%3Da2cA%40mail.gmail.com

thanks
Shveta