Re: Logical Replication of sequences
shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 12:55 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Sept 2025 at 12:23, shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > sequencesync_list_invalidate_cb(): > > 5) > > > > + /* invalidate all entries */ > > + hash_seq_init(&status, sequences_to_copy); > > + while ((entry = (LogicalRepSequenceInfo *) hash_seq_search(&status)) != NULL) > > + entry->entry_valid = false; > > > > Can you please elaborate when this case can be hit? I see such logic > > in all such invalidation functions registered with > > CacheRegisterRelcacheCallback(), but could not find any relevant > > comment. > > I noticed this could happen in cases like: > create publication for all tables; > alter publication on many relations; > > but there might be more apart from this > Okay. I will review more here. > Rest of the comments were addressed. > The attached patch has the changes for the same. > Thanks. I found a race condition between the apply worker and the sequence sync worker, where a sequence might be deleted from pg_subscription_rel and fail to be re-added when it should be. Steps: 1) The publisher and subscriber both have two sequences: seq1 and seq2. 2) A REFRESH PUBLICATION SEQUENCES command is executed on the subscriber. Before the sequencesync worker on the subscriber can locate the corresponding sequence on the publisher, the sequence gets dropped on the publisher. In other words, the sequence is removed from the publisher before walrcv_exec() is called in copy_sequences(). 3) Before the sequencesync worker on the subscriber can drop the sequence locally, it is recreated on the publisher. Then, a second REFRESH PUBLICATION SEQUENCES command is executed on the subscriber. (i.e., before RemoveSubscriptionRel() is reached in copy_sequences(), the sequence is already recreated on the publisher and a new refresh command is issued on the subscriber.) 4) During this second REFRESH PUBLICATION SEQUENCES, the sequence is found to already exist in pg_subscription_rel, so it is not re-added. However, concurrently, the sequencesync worker from the first refresh proceeds and drops the sequence from the subscriber. As a result, the sequence ends up being removed from pg_subscription_rel, even though it should have remained after both REFRESH PUBLICATION SEQUENCES commands. thanks Shveta