Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade
shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
From: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
To: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>,
Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>,
"Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-06-09T04:17:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 10:36 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Ajin,
> I have reviewed the patch and here are some comments:
>
> 1. I want to clarify, what is the expected behaviour when we upgrade
> the postgres instance from version <= 16 to "HEAD + patch"?
> - ReplicationOriginNameForLogicalRep(subid, InvalidOid, originname,
> sizeof(originname));
> - replorigin_create(originname);
> + if (!IsBinaryUpgrade)
> + {
> + ReplicationOriginNameForLogicalRep(subid, InvalidOid,
> originname, sizeof(originname));
> + replorigin_create(originname);
> + }
> and
> + /* Dump replication origins */
> + if (server_version >= 170000 && binary_upgrade &&
> archDumpFormat == archNull)
> + dumpReplicationOrigins(conn);
>
> When the postgres instance with subscription is updated from PG 16 (or
> less) to HEAD, the replication origin is created as we do not have "if
> (!IsBinaryUpgrade)" check in HEAD,
> whereas when the similar instance is upgraded to "HEAD + patch", no
> replication origin is present after the upgrade.
> Is this difference in the behaviour between HEAD and "HEAD + patch" expected?
>
Good catch Shlok. IMO, the behaviour should be same even if we upgrade
to HEAD+patch, it should not result in the loss of origins.
thanks
Shveta
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Introduce replication progress tracking infrastructure.
- 5aa2350426c4 9.5.0 cited