Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby

shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>

From: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-07-21T11:46:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:36 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:05 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:26 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 7:37 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
> > > <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > > 3. As mentioned in the initial email, I think it would be better to
> > > replace LIST_SLOTS command with a SELECT query.
> > >
> >
> > I had a look at this thread. I am interested to work on this and can
> > spend some time addressing the comments given here.
>
> Thanks for your interest. Coincidentally, I started to split the patch
> into 2 recently - 0001 making the specified logical wal senders wait
> for specified standbys to ack, 0002 synchronize logical slots. I think
> I'll have these patches ready by early next week. For 0002, I'll
> consider your latest changes having LIST_SLOTS removed.
>

Thanks Bharat for letting us know. It is okay to split the patch, it
may definitely help to understand the modules better but shall we take
a step back and try to reevaluate the design first before moving to
other tasks?

I analyzed more on the issues stated in [1] for replacing LIST_SLOTS
with SELECT query. On rethinking, it might not be a good idea to
replace this cmd with SELECT in Launcher code-path, because we do not
have any database-connection in launcher and 'select' query needs one
and thus we need to supply dbname to it. We may take the
primary-dbname info in a new GUC from users, but I feel retaining LIST
cmd is a better idea over adding a new GUC. But I do not see a reason
why we should get complete replication-slots info in LIST command. The
logic in Launcher is to get distinct database-ids info out of all the
slots and start worker per database-id. Since we are only interested
in database-id, I think we should change LIST_SLOTS to something like
LIST_DBID_FOR_LOGICAL_SLOTS. This new command may get only unique
database-ids for all the logical-slots (or the ones mentioned in
synchronize_slot_names) from primary. By doing so, we can avoid huge
network traffic in cases where the number of replication slots is
quite high considering that max_replication_slots can go upto
MAX_BACKENDS:2^18-1.  So I plan to make this change where we retain
LIST cmd over SELECT query but make this cmd's output restricted to
only database-Ids. Thoughts?

Secondly, I was thinking if the design proposed in the patch is the
best one. No doubt, it is the most simplistic design and thus may
prove very efficient for scenarios where we have a reasonable number
of workers starting and each one actively busy in
slots-synchronisation, handling almost equivalent load.  But since we
are starting one worker per database id, it may not be most efficient
for cases where not all the databases are actively being used. We may
have some workers (started for databases not in use) just waking up
and sending queries to primary and then going back to sleep and in the
process generating network traffic, while others may be heavily loaded
to deal with large numbers of active slots for a heavily loaded
database. I feel the design should be adaptable to load conditions
i.e. if we have more number of actively used slots, then we should
have more workers spawned to handle it and when the work is less then
the number of spawned workers should be less.
I have not thought it thoroughly yet and also not sure whether it will
actually come out as a better one, but it or more such designs should
be considered before we start fixing bugs in this patch. Kindly let me
know if there are already discussions around it which I might have
missed.  Any feedback is appreciated.

[1] : https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJpy0uCMNz3XERP-Vzp-7rHFztJgc6d%2BxsmUVCqsxWPkZvQz0Q%40mail.gmail.com

thanks
Shveta



Commits

  1. Doc: Add the new section "Logical Replication Failover".

  2. Fix the review comments and a bug in the slot sync code.

  3. Fix a test in failover slots regression test.

  4. Fix the intermittent buildfarm failures in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.

  5. Split XLogCtl->LogwrtResult into separate struct members

  6. Ensure that the sync slots reach a consistent state after promotion without losing data.

  7. Introduce a new GUC 'standby_slot_names'.

  8. Fix BF failure introduced by commit b3f6b14cf4.

  9. Fixups for commit 93db6cbda0.

  10. Fix BF failure in commit 93db6cbda0.

  11. Add a new slot sync worker to synchronize logical slots.

  12. Improve ERROR/LOG messages added by commits ddd5f4f54a and 7a424ece48.

  13. Disable autovacuum on primary in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync test.

  14. Fix the incorrect format specifier used in commit 7a424ece48.

  15. Change the LOG level in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.pl to DEBUG2.

  16. Add more LOG and DEBUG messages for slot synchronization.

  17. Another try to fix BF failure introduced in commit ddd5f4f54a.

  18. Fix BF introduced in commit ddd5f4f54a.

  19. Add a slot synchronization function.

  20. Clean-ups for 776621a5e4 and 7329240437.

  21. Enhance libpqrcv APIs to support slot synchronization.

  22. Add a failover option to subscriptions.

  23. Allow setting failover property in the replication command.

  24. Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.

  25. Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.

  26. Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.

  27. Allow upgrades to preserve the full subscription's state.

  28. Add support for incremental backup.

  29. Simplify some logic in CreateReplicationSlot()

  30. Fix uninitialized access to InitialRunningXacts during decoding after ERROR.

  31. Flexible options for CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT.

  32. Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.

  33. Fix oldest xmin and LSN computation across repslots after advancing

  34. Require C99 (and thus MSCV 2013 upwards).