Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
From: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-05-04T05:48:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow logical replication conflicts to be logged to a table.
- a5918fddf10d master landed
-
Avoid orphaned objects dependencies
- 2fbb21170e90 19 (unreleased) cited
On Sat, May 2, 2026 at 2:40 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 7:16 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 4. pg_conflict is the catalog schema and as Nisha reported, > > non-superusers aren't allowed to access the objects within it. Because > > of this, SELECT, DELETE, and TRUNCATE are disallowed even for the > > subscription owner if that owner is a non-superuser. I am working on > > the fix. > > While analyzing this, I realized that the schema ACL check happens > very early in analyze phase [1]. I'm not sure if we can bypass the > subscription owner from this check at that stage without implementing > a hacky solution. Another option is to remove restrictions from the > pg_conflict schema for all users and keep only table-level > restrictions within that schema. I am exploring how to implement this. Dilip, instead of granting permission (or removing restrictions) on the pg_conflict schema to all users, is there a way to grant USAGE on the schema only to the subscription owner when the conflict log table is created and when the owner is altered for the subscription? I think it should resolve the problem in a better way. Thoughts? Let me know if I am missing something. thanks Shveta