Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 10:10 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 5, 2025 10:09 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Here is V57 patch set which addressed most of comments.
> >
> > In this version, I also fixed a bug that the apply worker continued to find dead
> > tuples even if it has already stop retaining dead tuples.
>
> Here is a V58 patch set which improved few things by internal review:
>
> 0001:
>
Thank You for the patches, please find a few comments on 001 alone:
1)
+ /*
+ * Return if the wait time has not exceeded the maximum limit
+ * (max_conflict_retention_duration).
+ */
+ if (!TimestampDifferenceExceeds(rdt_data->candidate_xid_time, now,
+ max_conflict_retention_duration +
+ rdt_data->table_sync_wait_time))
We can add comments here as in why we are adding table-sync time to
max_conflict_retention_duration.
2)
relmutex comment says:
/* Used for initial table synchronization. */
Oid relid;
char relstate;
XLogRecPtr relstate_lsn;
slock_t relmutex;
We shall update this comment as now we are using it for other
purposes. Also name is specific to relation (due to originally created
for table-sync case). We can rename it to be more general so that it
can be used for oldest-xid access purposes as well.
3)
+ Assert(TransactionIdIsValid(rdt_data->candidate_xid));
+ Assert(rdt_data->phase == RDT_WAIT_FOR_PUBLISHER_STATUS ||
+ rdt_data->phase == RDT_WAIT_FOR_LOCAL_FLUSH);
+
+ if (!max_conflict_retention_duration)
+ return false;
Shall we move 'max_conflict_retention_duration' NULL check as the
first step. Or do you think it will be better to move it to the caller
before should_stop_conflict_info_retention is invoked?
4)
+ The information useful for conflict detection is no longer retained if
+ all apply workers associated with the subscriptions, where
+ <literal>retain_dead_tuples</literal> is enabled, confirm that the
+ retention duration exceeded the
+ <literal>max_conflict_retention_duration</literal>. To re-enable
+ retention, you can disable <literal>retain_dead_tuples</literal> and
+ re-enable it after confirming this replication slot has been dropped.
But the replication slot will not be dropped unless all the
subscriptions have disabled retain_dead_tuples. So shall the above doc
somehow mention this part as well otherwise it could be misleading for
users.
5)
pg_stat_subscription_stats: retain_dead_tuples
Can it cause confusion as both subscription's parameter and
pg_stat_subscription_stats's column have the same name while may have
different values. Shall the stats one be named as
'effective_retain_dead_tuples'?
thanks
Shveta
Commits
-
Fix intermittent BF failures in 035_conflicts.
- 0f42206531b3 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix intermittent test failure introduced in 6456c6e2c4.
- 01d793698f59 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix Coverity issue reported in commit a850be2fe.
- 5ac3c1ac22cb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add test to prevent premature removal of conflict-relevant data.
- 6456c6e2c4ad 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add max_retention_duration option to subscriptions.
- a850be2fe653 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Detect and report update_deleted conflicts.
- fd5a1a0c3e56 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Preserve conflict-relevant data during logical replication.
- 228c37086855 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Integrate FullTransactionIds deeper into two-phase code
- 62a17a92833d 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Improve checks for GUC recovery_target_timeline
- fd7d7b719137 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Prevent excessive delays before launching new logrep workers.
- fd519419c948 18.0 cited
-
Keep WAL segments by slot's last saved restart LSN
- ca307d5cec90 18.0 cited
-
Rework some code handling pg_subscription data in psql and pg_dump
- 08691ea958c2 18.0 cited
-
Use generateClonedIndexStmt to propagate CREATE INDEX to partitions.
- 68dfecbef210 18.0 cited