Re: Logical Replication of sequences
shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 5:00 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 12:24, Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 6:43 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 14:11, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [...] > >> A new catalog table, pg_subscription_seq, has been introduced for > >> mapping subscriptions to sequences. Additionally, the sequence LSN > >> (Log Sequence Number) is stored, facilitating determination of > >> sequence changes occurring before or after the returned sequence > >> state. > > > > > > Can't it be done using pg_depend? It seems a bit excessive unless I'm missing > > something. > > We'll require the lsn because the sequence LSN informs the user that > it has been synchronized up to the LSN in pg_subscription_seq. Since > we are not supporting incremental sync, the user will be able to > identify if he should run refresh sequences or not by checking the lsn > of the pg_subscription_seq and the lsn of the sequence(using > pg_sequence_state added) in the publisher. How the user will know from seq's lsn that he needs to run refresh. lsn indicates page_lsn and thus the sequence might advance on pub without changing lsn and thus lsn may look the same on subscriber even though a sequence-refresh is needed. Am I missing something here? thanks Shveta