Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>

From: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-04-24T06:11:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 3:21 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Nisha for the review. All your comments make sense so I have
> fixed them in the latest patch.
>

Hi Dilip,

Before we resume review, could you summarize any pending design points
(if any) from our last discussion? Sorry, I have lost track, a summary
will help.

thanks
Shveta



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Allow logical replication conflicts to be logged to a table.

  2. Avoid orphaned objects dependencies