Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
From: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>,
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-04-24T06:11:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 3:21 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Nisha for the review. All your comments make sense so I have > fixed them in the latest patch. > Hi Dilip, Before we resume review, could you summarize any pending design points (if any) from our last discussion? Sorry, I have lost track, a summary will help. thanks Shveta
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow logical replication conflicts to be logged to a table.
- a5918fddf10d master landed
-
Avoid orphaned objects dependencies
- 2fbb21170e90 19 (unreleased) cited