Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>

From: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, shveta malik <shvetamalik@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-05-21T06:01:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Amit, Vignesh,

A part of 007 patch is about preserving subscription-oid. Another
thread (origin migration) also needs the same logic as per discussion
at [1]. And there was a old thread which already attempted preserving
subscription-oid at [2], but the idea was rejected at that time. Why
don't we attempt to resume the same thread ([2]) and implement
preserving subscription-oid as a separate thread as we now have
multiple dependencies on it? Thoughts?

[1]:  https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2-uwpbJ8fnrssp%2BhORvOutsqRoZAsa05xVVzXe5Bt3bw%40mail.gmail.com
[2]:  https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALDaNm2Wj63VcbB0SY2NECHr1mKM1YSaV1ZydrdQVxyox2O2hg%40mail.gmail.com

thanks
Shveta