Re: row filtering for logical replication
Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:50 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think apart from the above, it might be good if we can find what > some other databases does in this regard? > I did a bit of investigation in the case of Oracle Database and SQL Server. (purely from my interpretation of available documentation; I did not actually use the replication software) For Oracle (GoldenGate), it appears that it provides the ability for filters to reference both OLD and NEW rows in replication of UPDATEs: "For update operations, it can be advantageous to retrieve the before values of source columns: the values before the update occurred. These values are stored in the trail and can be used in filters and column mappings" It provides @BEFORE and @AFTER functions for this. For SQL Server, the available replication models seem quite different to that in PostgreSQL, and not all seem to support row filtering. For "snapshot replication", it seems that it effectively supports filtering rows on the NEW values. It seems that the snapshot is taken at a transactional boundary and rows included according to any filtering, and is then replicated. So to include the result of a particular UPDATE in the replication, the replication row filtering would effectively be done on the result (NEW) rows. Another type of replication that supports row filtering is "merge replication", which again seems to be effectively based on NEW rows: "For merge replication to process a row, the data in the row must satisfy the row filter, and it must have changed since the last synchronization" It's not clear to me if there is ANY way to filter on the OLD row values by using some option. If anybody has experience with the replication software for these other databases and I've interpreted the documentation for these incorrectly, please let me know. Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia