Re: Adding column in a recursive query
Ibrahim Shaame <ishaame@gmail.com>
From: Ibrahim Shaame <ishaame@gmail.com>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "depesz@depesz.com" <depesz@depesz.com>, "pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-05T10:01:09Z
Lists: pgsql-novice
Thank you David for clarifying . Ibrahim Shaame On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 6:18 PM David G. Johnston < david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, March 30, 2026, Ibrahim Shaame <ishaame@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Effectively, after removing the column names from x(jina, namba, >> nasaba_1) it works now. Thank you very much. But then I don't understand >> the advantage or inconvenience of naming or not naming the columns there. >> Is there any explanation somewhere? >> > > SQL is big on providing ways to give aliases/names to things. It just > boils down to readability or, more often, conventions, as to which ones to > use. The CTE column names clause doesn’t get used much that I have seen. > You have to write a full query inside the CTE anyway so column aliases are > more conventional. > > David J. >